Why do not we eliminate saphenous vein in surgery?

Posted by
Why we chose CHIVA
  1. It is known that people who have varicose veins present alterations in the veins and tendency to recur. In this way, the less recurrences in the long term the better for the patient. The lower the magnitude of the procedures in the reinterventions, the better for the patient. CHIVA presented fewer recurrences in the long term than stripping in randomized clinical trials.
  2. If possible, retain the saphenous vein for future use. It may be important in coronary or limb saphenous (in cases of ischemia).
  3. Maintain leg circulation if recurrences, thrombosis or trauma occur in the future. This creates the need for increased circulation and drainage. (The saphenous vein is the natural bridge of the leg).
  4. Procedure adapts to the types of disease and sites of varicose veins.
  5. It preserves the drainage function of the saphenous vein to reduce recurrences of collaterals and microvarices.
  6. It limits the progression of varicose veins in case of a new deep leak point comes. (The new leaking points are common and there is no way to avoid them so far).
  7. The smaller the size and the lower the risk the better the procedure. Local anesthesia is low risk. In addition, local anesthesia prevents injuries to nerves that occur in procedures with rachi or general anesthesia.

    Storie: Feast after 200 sapphires spared from Brazil

Curta a página

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.